The Horizon of Unification: A Geopolitical and Economic Analysis of Real Estate on the Korean Peninsula Post-Unification

Overview

The unification of the Korean Peninsula is not only a long-held national aspiration but also a monumental event that would fundamentally reshape the geopolitical landscape. However, beyond emotional expectations, this is a time that demands a sober analysis of the economic and social repercussions of unification. The real estate market, in particular, which constitutes an absolute majority of national assets, is bound to experience extreme volatility in the face of such a colossal variable. This report aims to provide a multifaceted and in-depth analysis of the impact of unification on the real estate markets of both the Republic of Korea and North Korea.

This report argues that the effect of unification on the real estate market is not a singular phenomenon that can be simply labeled a "boon" or a "bust." Rather, it is a complex process driven by the interplay of three core factors: immense financial burdens, drastic demographic shifts, and a complete reorganization of the national spatial structure. The analysis concludes that while specific areas like the border region are likely to experience sharp price hikes due to speculative demand, the South Korean real estate market as a whole could face a prolonged downturn under the immense economic strain of unification costs. The valuation of North Korean real estate will be a long-term challenge, entangled with legal and political complexities that could take decades to resolve.

This report is intended for policymakers, strategic investors, decision-makers in the financial and construction sectors, and researchers in related fields. By providing data-driven, objective, and in-depth analysis, it seeks to offer a strategic framework for navigating future uncertainties.

Chapter 1: Two Systems: A Comparative Analysis of the South and North Korean Real Estate Landscapes

To predict the changes in the real estate market after unification, it is essential to first clearly understand the fundamental differences in the current real estate systems of South and North Korea. The mature, financialized market of South Korea, at the pinnacle of capitalist market economies, and the dual reality of North Korea, where the seeds of a market economy are sprouting under the principle of socialist state ownership, will inevitably clash during the unification process, revealing complex dynamics.

1.1 The South Korean Market: Maturity, Financialization, and Cyclicality

The real estate market in the Republic of Korea is characterized by high volatility, distinct regional differentiation, and the strong influence of government policy.1 Recent market trends clearly illustrate this complexity. According to 2024 data, nationwide housing sales prices have shifted to a downturn or seen their decline widen, indicating a cooling-off period. However,

jeonse (lump-sum deposit lease) prices in the Seoul metropolitan area, particularly in Seoul, continue to rise, showing disparate movements by region and property type.3 This suggests that the market does not move in a single direction and contains structural complexities.

The key drivers of this market are macroeconomic variables, especially interest rates and supply. In its "2024 KB Real Estate Report," the KB Financial Group Research Institute identified "supply and interest rates" as the most critical variables for this year's housing market, diagnosing that the timing and magnitude of interest rate cuts will determine the market's direction.2 This implies that any economic shock arising from the unification process, if it affects these two variables, will have an immediate and profound ripple effect on South Korean real estate values.

Structurally, the South Korean market has an overwhelming preference for apartments. Recent large-scale jeonse fraud incidents have deepened the aversion to non-apartment housing, further solidifying the preference for apartments.1 This is evidenced by the fact that the proportion of apartment sales transactions reached a record high in the cumulative data for September 2024.1 This "apartment-centric" market structure foretells that if a demand shock occurs due to factors like an influx of North Korean migrants after unification, its impact will be disproportionately concentrated in the apartment sector. Furthermore, the "polarization" between the metropolitan area and provincial regions is a chronic problem in the market, and the variable of unification is also highly likely to exacerbate this phenomenon.1

1.2 The North Korean Paradigm: The Dawn of State Ownership and Marketization

North Korea's real estate system has two faces: the official legal framework and the unofficial market reality. This duality is the key factor that will make property rights issues extremely complex after unification.

1.2.1 Legal Framework: The State as the Sole Landlord

According to the North Korean Constitution and Land Law, all land is owned by the state and social cooperative organizations, and private land ownership is fundamentally prohibited.8 The state manages real estate through a series of regulations such as the

Real Estate Management Act and the Housing Act. The core focus of these laws is not the guarantee of private property rights but the registration, management, and collection of usage fees for state assets.10 In other words, North Korean residents are merely "users" of real estate, not "owners."

1.2.2 "Usage Rights" as a Primitive Property Right

However, even in a reality where ownership is denied, the concept of transferable "usage rights (liyonggwon)" has emerged, functioning as a de facto property right. This concept is most formalized in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) like Rason and Kaesong. In these areas, foreign investors can lease land for up to 50 years and can transfer, inherit, or mortgage this right to a third party.9 This is a significant ideological retreat from the grand principle of state ownership and is highly significant in that it presents a prototype of a privatization model that could be applied to the entire country in the future.

1.2.3 The Unofficial Market (Jangmadang Economy)

Behind the legal system, a vibrant informal housing market has been operating for decades. Housing usage rights, represented by "ipsajeung (housing use permits)," are traded covertly, with prices often denominated in foreign currencies like the US dollar or Chinese yuan.12 The existence of this informal market proves that capitalist concepts such as the value of real estate, the importance of location, and private wealth accumulation are already widespread among North Koreans. The North Korean authorities' response is ambiguous. While officially subject to crackdowns, it is condoned in reality, and they have even taken measures that seem to indirectly acknowledge informal ownership, such as imposing taxes on private plots (sotoji).12 This has led to the formation of a class with de facto ownership rights, and their claims will become a serious source of conflict during the legal transition process after unification.

1.2.4 State-Led Development and the Role of the "Donju"

This marketization has accelerated further with the promotion of large-scale construction projects under the Kim Jong-un era. To meet construction targets, the authorities have attracted investment from a new capitalist class known as the "donju." The donju have accumulated wealth by financing construction and, in return, receiving a portion of the completed apartments to sell on the informal market.12 This collusion between the state and private capital has created a new housing stock with embedded market prices, showing that a capitalist real estate development and sales model is budding within the framework of a state-planned economy.

These stark differences between South and North Korea foreshadow an inevitable clash in the unification process. The biggest obstacle to resolving North Korea's real estate problem is not the absence of a market, but rather the complex entanglement of rights of different natures. Upon unification, a single apartment in Pyongyang could be subject to at least three conflicting claims of rights. First, the de jure ownership of the unified government, which inherits the property rights of the North Korean regime. Second, the historical restitution claims of the original owners and their descendants who owned the land before 1945. Third, the de facto rights of the current resident who purchased an "ipsajeung" from a party official in 2015. This will lead to legal disputes far more complex than those in the case of East Germany. Policymakers will have to make a political decision on which of these three rights to prioritize, and that decision will have a profound impact on the social stability and economic future of a unified Korea.

---

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of South and North Korean Real Estate Systems

Category	Republic of Korea (ROK)	Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)
Ownership Principle	Private property rights guaranteed by the Constitution	State and social cooperative organization ownership 8
Key Legal Basis	Civil Act, Real Estate Registration Act	Constitution, Land Law, Real Estate Management Act 10
Market Mechanism	Price determination by free market principles (supply/demand)	Distribution by state plan, proliferation of informal market (Jangmadang) 12
Valuation Method	Market-based appraisal, official land price system 15	State-set usage fees, informal market prices 10
Financial System	Mature mortgage market	Absence of formal mortgage system, prevalence of private lending 13
Core Challenges	Price volatility, regional imbalance, household debt	Lack of legal rights, dilapidated infrastructure, institutionalization of informal transactions

---

Chapter 2: The German Precedent: Lessons from Post-Unification Real Estate Integration

While the case of German unification is not a direct blueprint for the Korean Peninsula, it serves as a valuable reference, illustrating the practical challenges that arise when integrating two disparate real estate systems. In particular, Germany's experience contains a stark warning about how well-intentioned policy decisions can lead to unforeseen negative economic consequences.

2.1 The Fundamental Principle: "Restitution Before Compensation"

The 1990 German Unification Treaty adopted "Restitution vor Entschädigung" (Restitution before Compensation) as the guiding principle for resolving property issues in the unification process. This meant returning property confiscated without compensation by the East German regime after 1949 to its original owners or their heirs.17 While this decision had political and moral legitimacy, it acted as a severe shackle on the East German economy in the early stages of unification.

This principle triggered over 2 million property restitution claims. The prevalence of ownership disputes made the legal status of land unclear, becoming a decisive obstacle to investment in the former East German region.17 Investors were reluctant to purchase land with uncertain ownership or to build on it, causing the reconstruction and development of the East German region to be delayed for years.

2.2 Market Trends and Price Changes

Unification had contrasting effects on the East and West German real estate markets.

• West Germany: Experienced a real estate boom immediately after unification. From 1989 to 1995, housing prices rose by 34.1%, a result of a surge in demand from East German migrants combined with general economic optimism about unification.19
• East Germany: A massive construction boom occurred, fueled by West German capital and government subsidies.20 Enormous investments were made to rebuild dilapidated infrastructure and supply new housing. However, this construction boom did not immediately lead to sustainable asset value appreciation. Because the fundamental economic base, such as jobs and income, was weak, some areas experienced oversupply problems. After the initial unification boom faded, the East German real estate market suffered a long period of stagnation.19

Despite decades of massive investment, the economic and real estate value gaps between the former East and West German regions still remain. The German experience clearly shows that simply building infrastructure and housing does not create value; it must be followed by sustainable economic activity.

2.3 Applicability to the Korean Peninsula and Key Differences

While Germany's experience offers several implications for the Korean Peninsula, it is crucial to recognize the critical differences between the two cases.

• Similarities: The issue of historical ownership claims for property confiscated before and after liberation 17 and the inevitability of large-scale, state-led infrastructure and construction investment in the North Korean region after unification are similar to Germany's case.20 Additionally, there is a high probability of a surge in housing demand in certain areas of South Korea due to North Korean migrants in the early stages of unification.18
• Critical Differences:
  • Economic Gap: The per capita GDP gap between North and South Korea is far greater than the gap between East and West Germany at the time of their unification.21 This means the scale of unification costs and the financial burden on the South Korean economy will be exponentially larger than in Germany's case. This will act as a more severe constraint on the overall South Korean economy and its real estate market.
  • Duration of Division: The Korean Peninsula has been divided for a much longer period than Germany. This suggests that original owners are less likely to be alive, and inheritance relationships are intricately entangled over several generations, making the resolution of historical property restitution claims much more difficult.
  • Legal History: Unlike Germany, North Korea has had an active informal real estate market for decades. Through this market, a class of "donju" and ordinary residents who have invested their own capital to acquire de facto ownership has formed.12 Unlike East German residents who simply received housing from the state, their claims carry a different moral and economic weight. This adds a new dimension of complexity that Germany did not experience.

The German experience sends its most important warning to the Korean Peninsula through the concept of the "restitution trap." We must remember that the "restitution before compensation" principle, which seemed morally sound, had disastrous consequences for the East German economy in the short and medium term. A unified Korea will face the same choice, but the repercussions will be far greater. Just as Germany's restitution policy caused legal chaos and paralyzed investment 17, applying the same principle in Korea, with its longer history of division and more complex informal market structure 12, would lead to uncontrollable turmoil. A sharp conflict between historical claimants and current de facto owners is inevitable. Therefore, the most critical policy decision that must be made before unification is to set a clear direction on this issue. A choice must be made among (A) a pure restitution model like Germany's, (B) a pure compensation model where the government compensates historical claims with money and grants ownership to current occupants, or (C) a hybrid model that compromises between the two. This decision cannot be made in the chaos following unification; it must be fiercely debated and legally specified from now on to eliminate future investment uncertainty.

---

Table 2: German Unification: Real Estate Outcomes and Lessons for the Korean Peninsula

Policy/Outcome (Germany)	Analysis of German Experience	Implications & Differences for the Korean Peninsula
Resolution of Ownership Issues	Adoption of 'Restitution before Compensation' principle 17	Over 2 million ownership disputes, investment delayed for 10 years due to legal uncertainty
West German Real Estate Prices	Initial boom (34.1% rise) followed by long-term stagnation 19	Migrant demand and fiscal stimulus drove price increases
East German Real Estate Market	Massive, subsidy-based construction boom 20	Oversupply in some areas, sluggish value appreciation due to weak local economy
Financial Costs	Massive, long-term transfer payments from West to East Germany	Financed by tax hikes and national debt, placing a heavy burden on the German economy

---

Chapter 3: The Path to Unification: A Scenario-Based Framework

The impact on the real estate market will vary dramatically depending on 'how' unification is achieved. This chapter establishes two core scenarios for unification—'Gradual Integration' and 'Radical Integration'—and analyzes the different outcomes each scenario would have on the real estate market to provide a predictive framework.

3.1 Scenario A: Gradual Integration

This scenario assumes that South and North Korea pursue integration in stages through political agreement. Similar to the confederation or 'one country, two systems' models proposed by some researchers, economic integration would be managed over several decades, population movement would be controlled through a permit system, and legal and institutional frameworks would be gradually harmonized.24

This gradual approach would act to minimize the shock to the real estate market.

• North Korean Real Estate: The privatization process would proceed slowly in a controlled environment. Land values would rise incrementally, linked to specific development projects (e.g., expansion of Special Economic Zones) or infrastructure investments, and speculative overheating could be suppressed.
• South Korean Real Estate: The economic shock would be dispersed and maintained at a manageable level. The 'unification cost' would be paid in installments over a long period, minimizing the immediate fiscal burden.26 The South Korean real estate market would maintain overall stability, with moderate price increases in certain areas like the border region or in real estate associated with industrial sectors that can gradually access the North Korean market.

3.2 Scenario B: Radical Integration

This scenario assumes a situation similar to the German model, where South Korea effectively absorbs North Korea following a sudden collapse of the North Korean regime.24 This would be accompanied by an immediate and massive humanitarian and economic crisis, characterized by uncontrolled mass population movement and reactive, emergency policy responses.

Radical integration would inflict extreme and contradictory shocks on the real estate market.

• North Korean Real Estate: Could descend into a lawless state akin to the 'Wild West.' Until a formal property rights system is established, a legal vacuum would lead to rampant land grabs and extreme speculation. Real estate values would be unpredictable amidst the chaos.
• South Korean Real Estate: Would face a severe 'unification shock.'
  • Negative Shock: The need to finance enormous unification costs in a short period would deal a critical blow to the South Korean economy.23 The government would be forced to resort to emergency tax hikes (including a potential 'unification tax') and massive issuance of government bonds, leading to a sharp rise in interest rates. As economic uncertainty reaches its peak, the real estate market would be highly likely to collapse sharply.28
  • Positive Shock (Paradoxical): As uncontrolled North Korean migrants flock to the metropolitan area in search of jobs, a severe housing shortage could occur in specific areas.28 This could lead to the paradoxical phenomenon of soaring rents and small apartment prices in some parts of Seoul, even amidst a general market collapse. This means a simultaneous boom and bust in the market.

The concept of the 'Valley of transition,' where the costs of unification precede its benefits, is key to explaining the difference between the two scenarios.29 The depth and width of this valley will determine the fate of the real estate market. The gradual scenario makes this valley gentle and long, dispersing the shock, while the radical scenario creates a deep and steep canyon, destabilizing the entire South Korean economy.

The costs of unification are immense 30, and radical unification demands that these costs be paid all at once.28 Such a massive fiscal shock would force austerity, high taxes, and high-interest-rate policies, which are the greatest enemies of a healthy real estate market.2 Therefore, despite its long-term potential, radical unification is almost certain to trigger a severe and prolonged recession in the South Korean real estate market in the short term. In contrast, the gradual scenario avoids this 'shock therapy' by spreading the costs over time 27, giving the market time to adapt. From the perspective of real estate market stability, the gradual scenario is a far more desirable path than the radical one. Ultimately, the debate over the unification scenario is a direct debate about the future stability of household assets in the Republic of Korea.

---

Table 3: Unification Scenario Analysis: Predicted Impact on the Real Estate Market

Key Variable	Scenario A: Gradual Integration	Scenario B: Radical Integration
Integration Speed	Phased, managed process over 10-30 years 24	Sudden, reactive process within 1-5 years
Population Movement	Controlled and limited movement	Large-scale, uncontrolled migration to the South
Fiscal Cost Burden	Dispersed over decades, manageable annual burden 27	Massive initial costs concentrated, leading to a fiscal crisis 23
North Korean Real Estate Market	Gradual privatization, controlled development	Legal vacuum, land grabs, chaos followed by state-led organization
South Korean Real Estate Market (Overall)	General stability, moderate long-term growth	Severe recession due to economic shock, high taxes/interest rates
South Korean Real Estate Market (Metropolitan Area)	Moderate demand increase	Paradoxical price surge due to housing shortage and general collapse occurring simultaneously 28
Investor Sentiment	Cautious optimism, selective investment	Initial panic and capital flight, followed by high-risk speculation

---

Chapter 4: Valuing the North: From Socialist Principles to Market Prices

The most critical technical task after unification will be the process of assigning monetary value to North Korea's land and real estate. This is more than just assigning a number; it is the process of creating capitalist property rights for socialist assets, a task intricately woven with political, legal, and economic challenges.

4.1 Building the Legal Foundation: Creating Property Rights from Scratch

Before valuation can begin, the legal and institutional infrastructure to guarantee private property rights and ensure transaction security must be established first.

• Step 1: Establishing a New Land Survey and Registration System: Building a modern cadastral survey and land registration system across North Korea is the starting point for everything. This is a monumental project requiring immense technical and financial resources and is an absolute prerequisite for a functioning real estate market.32
• Resolving the 'Three-Way Ownership Dispute': A political and legal framework must be established to resolve the complex rights conflict among the 'unified government, historical owners, and current de facto occupants' mentioned earlier. This will likely require the establishment of special tribunals or commissions and the enactment of new laws. Based on Germany's experience, this process could take more than a decade.17
• Transition from 'Usage Rights' to 'Ownership': A legal process is needed to convert the existing concept of 'usage rights (liyonggwon)' into full 'ownership.' The related regulations developed for foreign investors in Special Economic Zones 9 could serve as a starting point, but extensive amendments and supplements will be necessary to apply them to the entire North Korean population.

4.2 Initial Valuation Methodologies

In the absence of any market transaction records, traditional appraisal techniques are useless. Therefore, initial valuation will inevitably be a top-down process led by the government.

• Proxy-Based Models: Researchers have proposed models that estimate land value using proxy variables instead of market data. This method involves deriving a land price determination function based on past South Korean data (e.g., from the 1970s-80s when its economic level was similar to present-day North Korea) and then substituting proxy variables for North Korea, such as urban accessibility, infrastructure, and topography, obtained through GIS data, to estimate relative values.16
• Cost Approach and Potential Use Approach: Initial valuation could also be based on the cost of developing land for a specific purpose (e.g., creating an industrial complex). However, a more likely method is valuation based on 'potential use value' according to a state-led national development plan. For example, land designated as a site for a high-speed rail station would be assigned a high value, while remote forest land would be given a low value.
• Lessons from the Kaesong Industrial Complex: Although limited to a specific area, the Kaesong Industrial Complex Appraisal Standards is the only official framework that has valued North Korean land based on market principles and can provide methodological guidance.34

4.3 Forecasting the Formation of a Value Hierarchy

After unification, North Korean real estate will form a clear value hierarchy based on its potential.

• Tier 1: Core Cities and Strategic Regions
  • Pyongyang: As the capital, it possesses the best infrastructure and human capital and will form the highest value.35
  • Kaesong and Border Areas: Geographical proximity to South Korea gives them high potential value as prime locations for integrated industrial and logistics complexes.35
  • Major Tourist Destinations: Places like Mount Kumgang and Wonsan have immense tourism development potential, leading to high land value assessments.35
• Tier 2: Major Economic and Logistics Hubs
  • Nampo: As the gateway port to Pyongyang, it is a key hub for trade.35
  • Sinuiju: As the gateway to China, it will play a central role as a hub for continental trade.37
  • Rason (Rajin-Sonbong): As an existing SEZ, it has port facilities and connectivity to China and Russia.38
• Tier 3: Industrial and Resource-Rich Regions
  • The land value in regions rich in mineral resources like magnesite, iron ore, and rare earth elements will be directly linked to the feasibility of mining and commercializing those resources.40 The value lies not just in the resources buried underground, but in whether the infrastructure (railways, ports, electricity) to transport them to market is built.41
• Tier 4: Agricultural and Rural Areas
  • Value will be determined by agricultural productivity. The 'Land Readjustment Project' previously promoted by North Korea aimed to increase the efficiency of arable land, and this could be used as basic data for future farmland valuation.8

The initial valuation of North Korean land will not be the result of objective market analysis. It will be, in essence, a political and strategic act. In the absence of market data 16, valuation will have to be top-down. The unified government will have a national development plan, such as the 'New Economic Map of the Korean Peninsula' 37, and will use land valuation as a powerful tool to realize this plan. The government can induce or deter private investment by assigning high values to land in areas it wants to develop and low values to other areas. For example, it can send signals about future value by offering favorable initial valuations or promising infrastructure investment for land included in planned development corridors. Conversely, it can deter development in ecologically sensitive or low-priority areas by assigning low values. Therefore, the first 'official land price map' of a unified Korea will not be a photograph reflecting current reality, but rather a blueprint declaring the state's will for the future, and it will be one of the most powerful industrial policy tools available to the unified government.

---

Table 4: Potential Valuation Tiers and Key Drivers by North Korean Region

Tier	Key Regions/Cities	Key Value Drivers	Major Challenges
Tier 1 (Top)	Pyongyang, Kaesong, Mt. Kumgang/Wonsan	Political capital, proximity to South Korea, tourism potential, superior human capital 35	High initial development costs, risk of speculative bubble formation
Tier 2 (Strategic Hubs)	Nampo, Sinuiju, Rason	Port logistics, gateway to China/Russia, existing SEZ infrastructure 37	Large-scale modernization of ports, railways, etc., is essential
Tier 3 (Industrial/Resource)	Hamhung, Chongjin, Musan, Tanchon	Abundant mineral resources (iron, magnesite, etc.), existing (but aging) industrial base 40	Volatility of international commodity prices, massive investment needed in mining/transport technology and infrastructure
Tier 4 (Agricultural)	Hwanghae provinces and other breadbaskets	Food production potential, possibility of transition to modern agribusiness	Soil degradation, need to modernize outdated agricultural technology

---

Chapter 5: The South Korean Market: Navigating the Unification Shockwave

The mature South Korean real estate market will be subjected to complex and often contradictory shocks in the face of the colossal wave of unification. This signifies not a simple rise or fall, but a fundamental shift that will shake the very structure of the market.

5.1 The Immense Weight of Unification Costs

The most immediate and overwhelming impact of unification will stem from the enormous cost burden.

• Scale of the Burden: Estimates of unification costs vary widely among research institutions, but they all point to an astronomical scale. They could range from hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars, potentially requiring annual expenditures equivalent to 5-12% of South Korea's GDP for over a decade.23 These costs include humanitarian aid, social welfare system integration, and the reconstruction of infrastructure across North Korea.
• Financing the Costs: The policies required to secure these massive funds are all negative for the real estate market. Large-scale tax increases (including a potential 'unification tax'), massive issuance of government bonds, and cuts to other government spending will be inevitable.23
• Economic Consequences: This fiscal pressure will trigger inflation, and the central bank will be forced to maintain a high-interest-rate policy to curb it and attract foreign capital. High taxes will reduce disposable income, and high interest rates will increase borrowing costs. This is the most lethal combination for the debt-driven South Korean real estate market.2

5.2 Demand-Side Shocks: Migration and Demographic Shifts

In addition to the cost shock, population movement will bring another dimension of volatility to the market.

• Wave of Migrants: In a radical unification scenario, a large-scale, uncontrolled influx of North Korean migrants into South Korea is almost certain. Most of them will concentrate in the metropolitan area in search of economic opportunities.28
• The Paradox of Housing Shortage: This will cause a severe housing shortage in the metropolitan area, potentially leading to a sharp rise in the prices of low-cost apartments and rental housing. However, this phenomenon is likely to occur simultaneously with a general market collapse due to the fiscal crisis. In other words, the market will be engulfed in extreme polarization and instability, with a contradictory situation where some areas soar while others plummet.28
• Managed Migration: In a gradual unification scenario, the government can mitigate this shock to the housing market by controlling population movement.

5.3 Investor Sentiment: A Tug-of-War Between Risk and Opportunity

Unification will exert two opposing forces on investor psychology simultaneously.

• Resolution of the 'Korea Discount': Stable unification will have the effect of eliminating the geopolitical risk that has long suppressed the value of Korean assets. This 'peace dividend' is a positive factor that could attract a significant amount of foreign investment in the long run.28
• The 'Unification Risk' Premium: However, in the short and medium term, the immense economic and social instability caused by unification will create a new 'unification risk.' Fear of economic collapse, social chaos, and policy uncertainty could trigger a flight of domestic and foreign capital, leading to a sell-off in the stock and real estate markets.28 In the short term, this negative risk premium is very likely to overwhelm the long-term peace dividend effect.

In conclusion, the common discourse on unification—a simple 'boom' or 'bust'—is an oversimplification of reality. The reality will be 'The Great Divergence.' That is, unification will split the South Korean real estate market in two, leading to a stark divergence in the fortunes of different property types and regions. The fiscal crisis 23 will hit high-priced, investment-oriented properties in areas like Gangnam, which are most sensitive to interest rates and investor sentiment, the hardest. At the same time, the influx of migrants with limited capital 28 will create explosive demand for affordable rental housing and small apartments in non-Gangnam areas of Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Thus, a bizarre scenario where the price of a luxury apartment in Gangnam falls by 30% while the price of a small apartment in Guro or Incheon rises by 30% could become a reality. This divergence will also occur regionally, with the border region experiencing a boom while non-strategic provincial cities fall into decline. At this point, the national average housing price change rate will become a meaningless statistic.

---

Table 5: Impact Matrix of Unification on the South Korean Real Estate Market

Driving Force	Key Impact	Market Segment Most Affected
[Negative] Fiscal Burden (High Taxes/High Interest Rates)	Decreased purchasing power and investment returns	High-priced apartments (e.g., Gangnam), commercial real estate
[Negative] Economic Uncertainty	Triggers capital flight, delays investment decisions	All sectors, especially foreign-owned assets and new development projects
[Positive/Chaotic] Influx of North Korean Migrants	Surge in demand for low-cost, basic housing	Mid-to-low-priced apartments and rental housing in the metropolitan area 28
[Positive] Resolution of Geopolitical Risk	Attracts global capital with long-term 'peace dividend'	Prime commercial real estate, large-scale development projects (long-term perspective)
[Positive] Infrastructure Development Boom	Increased demand for construction materials and related services	Industrial real estate, assets of construction/engineering firms

---

Chapter 6: A New National Map: Regional Real Estate Dynamics in a Unified Korea

Unification will fundamentally redraw the economic and real estate map of the Korean Peninsula. Existing concepts of center and periphery will be dismantled, and new growth axes will emerge, leading to a major reorganization of the national spatial structure.

6.1 The Border Region: From DMZ to 'Growth Belt'

The border region, long underdeveloped due to various regulations such as the Military Facility Protection Act, will be transformed into the central artery of a unified Korea.45

• Engine of Transformation: This area will become a hub for logistics and transportation, connecting the South and North and extending to the continent. Its importance will be highlighted as a node where the Trans-Korean Railway (TKR) connects with the Trans-Siberian Railway (TSR) and the Trans-China Railway (TCR).37 Furthermore, it has great potential to be developed as a center for eco-peace tourism, leveraging the unique characteristics of the DMZ. Government initiatives like the 'Eco-Peace Belt' or the 'DMZ World Peace Park' signal that massive public funds will be invested in this region.47
• Market Impact: A large-scale, speculative land price boom is almost certain. The border region will be one of the few areas to experience a clear and immediate price increase due to unification, but it also carries the risk of an extreme bubble.

6.2 The Northern Development Corridor: The Rise of a New Economic Axis

The government's 'New Economic Map of the Korean Peninsula' initiative presents a blueprint for national development after unification, which in turn signifies the future real estate value map.37 The core of this plan is an H-shaped structure of three major belts.

• West Coast Industrial, Logistics, and Transportation Belt: This axis, connecting the metropolitan area-Kaesong-Pyongyang-Sinuiju, will become a key industrial and logistics corridor for trade with China.37 The special economic zones and industrial complexes to be established along this axis will be the main drivers of surrounding land values.
• East Coast Energy and Resource Belt: This axis, connecting Busan-Wonsan-Rason, will become a channel for energy, resource, and tourism cooperation with Russia and the Pacific Rim.37 Port development, resource transport infrastructure, and tourism facility construction will determine the value of this region.
• Value Creation: These development axes, explicitly presented by the government, signify areas where massive infrastructure investment will be concentrated. Land located along the planned routes will experience significant value appreciation.

6.3 The South Korean Equation: A Shifting Center of Gravity

As national attention and resources inevitably shift northward, the economic center of gravity within South Korea will also change.

• Beneficiary Regions: The metropolitan area, northern Gyeonggi Province, and northern Gangwon Province will become the new 'front line' of the continental economy, benefiting from their proximity to North Korea.
• Potentially Marginalized Regions: In contrast, southern regions that are far from the new national development axis (e.g., Honam, parts of Gyeongnam) could experience economic and demographic stagnation. As the young population moves north in search of new opportunities, an outflow of population could occur, leading to a decline in real estate prices in those areas. This means the 'Great Divergence' phenomenon mentioned earlier will expand to a national scale.

In conclusion, the value of real estate in a unified Korea will be determined more by proximity to new, state-planned infrastructure than by traditional factors. North Korea currently lacks modern infrastructure 22, and the top priority of a unified government will be to build railways, roads, and ports.37 These projects will be the main channels for pouring trillions of dollars into the North Korean economy. Land adjacent to these new infrastructure nodes will be the first to appreciate in value as it becomes essential for logistics, industrial, and commercial activities. Therefore, the wisest real estate investment strategy in a unified Korea will not be to follow existing cities, but to 'follow the infrastructure.' Securing land along the planned routes of the West and East Coast development corridors will be key, as the government's infrastructure plans will literally create real estate value out of nothing.

Chapter 7: Long-Term Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

This chapter synthesizes the preceding analysis to forecast the long-term landscape of the Korean Peninsula's real estate market and to offer policy recommendations for a stable integration.

7.1 The Road to a Stable, Integrated Market (20-30 Year Outlook)

The integration of the Korean Peninsula's real estate market after unification will be a long-term process spanning several decades.

• Phase 1 (First 10 years): This will be a period dominated by extreme volatility, legal disputes, and public sector investment. The South Korean market will experience a downturn under the pressure of unification costs, while speculative overheating will appear in specific areas of North Korea (border region, development corridors). Resolving ownership issues and establishing a cadastral system will be the most critical tasks of this period.
• Phase 2 (Middle 10 years): A more stable, private sector-led market will gradually begin to form in the North Korean region. As infrastructure is built and industries take root, a clear value hierarchy will emerge for major cities like Pyongyang, Kaesong, and Nampo.
• Phase 3 (Stabilization Period, 10 years): Full-scale market integration can begin. New economic centers in North Korea, such as Pyongyang or Kaesong, could reach a level where they compete with some of South Korea's provincial metropolitan cities in terms of economic scale and real estate value. The overall economic center of gravity of the Korean Peninsula will gradually shift northward.

7.2 Policy Recommendations for a Smooth Transition

To minimize the shock of unification and achieve stable integration, both pre-emptive preparation and post-facto management are crucial.

7.2.1 Pre-Unification (Immediate Priorities)

1. Establish a 'Special Committee on Post-Unification Real Estate Rights': This body should be established immediately to draft a legal framework for resolving the 'three-way ownership dispute' raised earlier. In particular, work must begin on forming a social consensus by making a clear political decision on the 'restitution vs. compensation' issue.
2. Develop a Detailed Cadastral Survey Plan: A concrete technical and financial roadmap must be established to carry out the massive task of surveying and registering land across North Korea. The introduction of modern surveying techniques using satellite technology, drones, etc., should be considered.
3. Initiate Public Discourse on 'Unification Costs and Financing': Work must begin to build a national consensus and manage expectations regarding the immense financial burden of unification. Various financing options, such as creating a 'unification fund' or issuing special-purpose 'unification bonds,' should be publicly discussed to prevent the political paralysis that could occur after unification.

7.2.2 Post-Unification (Implementation Tasks)

1. Implement Anti-Speculation Policies: To prevent unstable bubbles, strong anti-speculation measures must be implemented in the border region and major North Korean cities. The active use of temporary heavy transaction taxes, restrictions on foreign land ownership, and designation of land transaction permit zones should be considered.
2. Pursue Infrastructure-Led Development: The national infrastructure plan must be used as a key tool to guide private investment. This will ensure that development aligns with national strategic goals and proceeds rationally, preventing haphazard development.
3. Implement a Managed Migration Policy: A phased and controlled migration policy must be implemented to prevent shocks that South Korea's social services and housing market cannot absorb. The goal should be to find a balance that ensures labor mobility while minimizing social chaos.

The unification of the Korean Peninsula will present unprecedented challenges and opportunities for the real estate market. Successful integration requires more than just physically combining two markets; it demands sophisticated design and a long-term vision that encompasses legal, economic, and social systems. Only through thorough preparation and careful post-unification management can the benefits of unification be maximized and its costs minimized, thereby securing sustainable prosperity for the entire Korean Peninsula.

참고 자료

1. 2024년 부동산 시장의 특징과 시사점 - 현대경제연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://hri.co.kr/upload/board/2887055879_9tP0MDqT_20241125062650.pdf
2. 2024 KB 부동산 보고서 | 국내연구자료 | KDI 경제교육·정보센터, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/policy/domesticView.do?ac=0000182442
3. 2024년 12월 전국주택가격동향 - 부동산계산기, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://ezb.co.kr/board/measure/aJEH1FAQSQGA54i
4. 2024년 1월 전국주택가격동향 - 부동산계산기, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://ezb.co.kr/board/measure/C7ajjQNx677UvTY
5. [한국부동산원] 전국주택가격동향조사 (23.12), 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.krepa.or.kr/m/pages/sub06_08_view.php?no=285&page=15&search_type=&search_word=
6. KB금융, 부동산시장 변화의 이정표를 제공하는 『2024 KB 부동산 보고서』 발간, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kbfg.com/kbresearch/notice/noticeView.do?noticeId=2000122
7. KB금융, '2024 KB 부동산 보고서' 발간..."금리 인하 시기·폭 중요하게 작용할 것" - 포인트경제, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.pointe.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=9275
8. 김정은 시대 부동산시장의 평가와 전망, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://ifes.kyungnam.ac.kr/material/ifes/1480/artclDownload.do
9. 북한의 토지이용제 현황 및 평가.pdf, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://rd.kdb.co.kr/fileView?groupId=BC919530-F153-8B32-042E-03315A9F0BEE&fileId=26520_binary1_1.pdf
10. 북한 토지제도 변화1) - - 1990년대 이후를 중심으로, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nars.go.kr/fileDownload2.do?fileName=(%EA%B0%84%EB%8B%B4%ED%9A%8C_110918)1990%EB%85%84%EB%8C%80%20%EC%9D%B4%ED%9B%84%20%EB%B6%81%ED%95%9C%20%ED%86%A0%EC%A7%80%EC%A0%9C%EB%8F%84%20%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94%EC%99%80%20%EC%8B%9C%EC%82%AC%EC%A0%90_%EA%B9%80%EB%AF%B8%EC%88%99.pdf&doc_id=94906&timeStamp=1485129681250
11. 북한의 주택제도 현황과 개선 과제, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nars.go.kr/fileDownload2.do?currtPg=25&sort=normal&cmsCd=CM0033&pnum=0&cnum=0&category=NO&src=ALL&srcTemp=&pageSize=10&brd_Seq=15976&cms_Cd=CM0033&fileName=%EB%B6%81%ED%95%9C%EC%9D%98+%EC%A3%BC%ED%83%9D%EC%A0%9C%EB%8F%84+%ED%98%84%ED%99%A9%EA%B3%BC+%EA%B0%9C%EC%84%A0+%EA%B3%BC%EC%A0%9C_%EC%86%A1%ED%98%84%EC%9A%B1%28150423%29.pdf&doc_id=1Kp2niGytx2
12. 북한의 민생경제 현황과 비핵화 이후 변화 가능성 - KDI 한국개발연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kdi.re.kr/file/download?atch_no=3%2Bmiziy6G%2Bar8htEEIJv1w%3D%3D
13. 북한주택시장의 현황과 전망, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://researcher.hf.go.kr/researcher/sub02/sub02_04.do?mode=download&articleNo=298207&attachNo=56182
14. 북한 부동산 가치변화와 개발에 관한 연구 －평양을 중심으로－ - 동북아경제연구 - KISS, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3656700
15. 북한의 토지가격평가방법에 관한 연구, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://kpaj.or.kr/xml/22366/22366.pdf
16. Estimating Land Assets in North Korea: Framework Development & Exploratory Application, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202130648437820.page
17. 업게초점, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, http://kapanet.or.kr/kapabook/27/kapa6-1.htm
18. 통일 후 남북한 주택정책의 발전 방향 - 한국부동산학회, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, http://www.reacademy.org/rboard/data/krea2_new/60_12.pdf
19. 동향브리핑 - 한국건설산업연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cerik.re.kr/report/briefing/2388
20. 독일통일후 구동독지역 산업구조 변화와 한반도 통일시 정책적 시사점* - 통일연구 DB, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://udbs.unikorea.go.kr/user/board/download2.do?seq=3761
21. 독일 통일에 2조 유료...한반도, 더 똑똑한 국토 개발 전략 필요 - 한국경제, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hankyung.com/article/202504178418P
22. 통일 한국의 경제적 잠재력 추정 - 현대경제연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hri.co.kr/upload/board/201442181248[1].pdf
23. 경제자료 - KDI 한국개발연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kdi.re.kr/file/download?atch_no=AkMgThGAFeZfYcXVvN7gZw%3D%3D
24. 남북한 경제통합 시 북한경제의 한시적 분리 시나리오 - KDI Central Archives, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/30847
25. 통일준비 : - 한국법제연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.klri.re.kr/cmm/fms/FileDown.do?atchFileId=FILE_000000000009665vEjeI&fileSn=0&stat=journal¶m_gubun=Z&data_no=18
26. 통일비용에 대한 기존연구 검토, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nabo.go.kr/system/common/JSPservlet/download.jsp?fCode=9872&fName=%ED%86%B5%EC%9D%BC%EB%B9%84%EC%9A%A9%EC%97%90%20%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%20%EA%B8%B0%EC%A1%B4%EC%97%B0%EA%B5%AC%20%EA%B2%80%ED%86%A0.pdf&fBid=19&flag=bluenet
27. 한시적 분리론 - 나무위키, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%95%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%A0%81%20%EB%B6%84%EB%A6%AC%EB%A1%A0
28. 남북통일을 가정한 부동산 투자지역 전망 - 부동산 (시장) 정보 - Daum 카페, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://cafe.daum.net/invest08/DNld/228
29. 통일 후 남북한경제 한시분리운영방안: 경제적 필요성과 법적 타당성 | APEC Study Series, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10105030000&bid=0001&tag=&b_list=10&act=view&list_no=2182&nPage=72&vlist_no_npage=0&keyField=&keyWord=&orderby=
30. 국회예산정책처 > 보고서 > 분석보고서 > 전체 > [경제현안분석 제64호] 통일비용에 대한 기존연구 검토, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/01Report/01_01_Board.jsp?funcSUB=view&bid=19&arg_cid1=0&arg_cid2=0&arg_class_id=0¤tPageSUB=0&pageSizeSUB=15&key_typeSUB=subject&keySUB=%ED%86%B5%EC%9D%BC&search_start_dateSUB=&search_end_dateSUB=&row_mode=argue&sortBy=count&ascOrDesc=desc&item_id=2692&etc_cate1=&etc_cate2=&department=0&department_sub=0&search_key1=&etc_1=0&etc_2=0&tag_key=&name=null&name2=0&arg_id=3228
31. 통일비용 - 국회예산정책처, 통합검색, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nabo.go.kr/Sub/04Etc/04_Search.jsp?query=%ED%86%B5%EC%9D%BC%EB%B9%84%EC%9A%A9
32. [사법제도][통일사법]통일 이후 북한지역 토지등기 ... - 사법정책연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://jpri.scourt.go.kr/post/postView.do?boardSeq=7&menuSeq=11&lang=ko&seq=804
33. 북한 경제개발구법 제정 배경과 의미40, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.hri.co.kr/upload/board/20141617314[1].171851.PDF
34. 북한의 토지가격평가방법에 관한 연구 - Korea Planning Association, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://kpaj.or.kr/_PR/view/?aidx=22366&bidx=2091
35. 북한 거점도시 성장 잠재성 결정요인 분석 및 잠재성 평가 - 환서해 경제벨트를 중심으로* - 대한국토도시계획학회, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://kpa1959.or.kr/file/E105.pdf
36. 평양 대도시권의 발전 전망 연구 - KDI 한국개발연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kdi.re.kr/file/download?atch_no=Sk9Y9%2FW9Ks84fD%2BExiQC1A%3D%3D
37. 남북 관계 개선에 따른 부동산 전망 및 리스크별 접근법, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.lifentalk.com/1781
38. 13개 경제개발구와 신의주 특구 개발계획 - KBS WORLD, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, http://world.kbs.co.kr/service/contents_view.htm?lang=k&menu_cate=northkorea&id=&board_seq=148614
39. 북한의 경제특구 개발 동향과 남북협력 연계방안, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://kdi.re.kr/file/download?atch_no=cvwOg9lhpmhW%2BH%2FH9GAwmw%3D%3D
40. Ⅰ. 문제의식 1 Ⅱ. 지하자원의 규모 4 Ⅲ. 지하자원의 가치 13 Ⅳ. 북한의 지하자원 정책 18 Ⅴ. 남북자원협력 유망산업 20 Ⅵ. 자원협력의 방법과 절차 28 Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언 34 - 태재미래전략연구원, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.taejaefci.org/uploads/attachment/file/%EB%B6%81%ED%95%9C%EC%9D%98_%EC%A7%80%ED%95%98%EC%9E%90%EC%9B%90%EA%B3%BC_%EB%82%A8%EB%B6%81%EC%9E%90%EC%9B%90%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5_%EC%83%81%EC%84%B8%EB%B3%B8.pdf
41. 북한/지하자원 - 나무위키, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://namu.wiki/w/%EB%B6%81%ED%95%9C/%EC%A7%80%ED%95%98%EC%9E%90%EC%9B%90
42. 북한의 광물자원 현황과 단천(端川) 특구 - 과학기술정책지원서비스, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.k2base.re.kr/north/tech/pds12ANDpds13/view.do?recordCountPerPage=10&pageUnit=10&pageSize=10&pageIndex=23&nttId=5331&nttId2=69303&menuNo=&viewType=&schScale=IN2_TITLE%2FCONTENT%2FFILE&searchCont
43. 통일비용 방안에 관한 고찰1), 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.unilaw.go.kr/data1/fileupload/A/20150107/META_A030558_201501070218085640
44. 통일비용및 재원조달 방안에 관한 연구, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nabo.go.kr/system/common/JSPservlet/download.jsp?fCode=9681&fName=%ED%86%B5%EC%9D%BC%EB%B9%84%EC%9A%A9%EB%B0%8F%20%EC%9E%AC%EC%9B%90%EC%A1%B0%EB%8B%AC%20%EB%B0%A9%EC%95%88%EC%97%90%20%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C%20%EC%97%B0%EA%B5%AC.pdf&fBid=19&flag=bluenet
45. 기정훈 접경지역의 바람직한 개발방향, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, http://www.krda.org/newsletter/no9/sub2-2.html
46. 남북협력 추진과제를 중심으로 한 남북 접경지역의 국토이용 활용방안, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nrc.re.kr/boardDownload.es?bid=0008&list_no=144617&seq=1
47. 통일시대를 대비한 접경지역 시군통합의 필요성과 기대효과, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, http://www.kala.kr/data/file/articlesearch/3660796494_2vQE4pKN_08EAB980ECA095EC9984.pdf
48. 통일을 지향한 북한지역 국토개발 과제, 7월 31, 2025에 액세스, https://www.kpaj.or.kr/xml/03289/03289.pdf