A Comprehensive Analysis of Natural Vision Improvement: Evaluating the Scientific Evidence

Part 1: Fundamental Concepts of Vision and Refractive Errors

1.1 Beyond 20/20: Distinguishing Visual Acuity, Visual Function, and Ocular Health

The phrase "good vision" is used colloquially, but medically, it encompasses several distinct concepts. To scientifically evaluate claims of natural vision improvement, we must first clearly define these terms. When a user feels their "vision has improved," this could be a change in visual acuity, visual function, or ocular health, each with fundamentally different causes and methods of improvement.

Visual Acuity refers to the clarity or sharpness of vision, commonly measured with metrics like '20/20' or '1.0'.¹ It is determined by how accurately the eye's optical structures (cornea, lens) focus light onto the central part of the retina. Refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism) primarily affect visual acuity directly.

Visual Function/Skills extend beyond simply seeing clearly to encompass the dynamic abilities of the brain to efficiently process and use information received through the eyes. This includes the ability of both eyes to work together to perceive a single, three-dimensional image (Binocularity), the ability to shift focus accurately and quickly (Accommodation), and the ability to smoothly follow moving objects (Ocular Motility).¹ These are neurological skills that are learned and developed over time.

Ocular Health refers to the state of the eye's physical structures, such as the retina, optic nerve, and lens, being free from disease. Conditions like glaucoma, cataracts, and macular degeneration harm ocular health and can cause permanent damage to both visual acuity and function.

Distinguishing these three concepts is crucial. For example, proponents of unverified vision training methods often ambiguously describe the reduction of eye strain or improved concentration from visual function training as if the refractive error itself has been corrected. Therefore, clarifying which specific aspect of "vision" a therapy targets is the first step in its scientific validation.

1.2 The Physical Basis of Refractive Errors: Myopia, Hyperopia, and Astigmatism

Most claims of "natural vision improvement" assert that they can correct refractive errors. However, it is important to understand that refractive errors are not caused by 'bad habits' or 'weak muscles,' but are physical problems originating from the eye's anatomical structure.

Myopia (Nearsightedness) is a condition where the eyeball is longer than normal (axial myopia) or the cornea's refractive power is too strong, causing light to focus in front of the retina.⁵ This results in clear near vision but blurry distance vision. The progression of myopia, especially in children and adolescents, is primarily due to the irreversible elongation of the eyeball.

Hyperopia (Farsightedness) and Astigmatism are also structural problems, caused respectively by an eyeball that is too short or a cornea or lens that is irregularly shaped, preventing light from focusing to a single point on the retina.⁷

The eye's focusing is achieved by the ciliary muscle contracting and relaxing, which changes the thickness of the lens. This is distinctly different from the claims of some alternative therapies that the extraocular muscles change the shape of the entire eyeball.⁸ According to modern medical research, the human eyeball is not flexible enough to significantly change its shape for focusing; it is a very rigid structure.⁷ Therefore, the assertion that exercise or training can shorten an 'elongated eyeball' (the cause of myopia) or correct an 'irregular cornea' (the cause of astigmatism) directly contradicts currently known physiological facts.

1.3 A Critical Framework for Evaluation: Reversal, Functional Improvement, and Progression Control

To evaluate the various claims about vision improvement, we must establish three clear conceptual frameworks. These are often used interchangeably, but their scientific evidence and goals are entirely different.

1. Reversal of Refractive Error: This implies permanently changing the physical structure of the eye (e.g., shortening the axial length) to eliminate the refractive error itself. This requires the highest level of proof and is an area where therapies like the Bates Method make claims but have failed to provide scientific validation.7
2. Functional Improvement: This aims not to change the eye's structure but to train the neural circuits (the brain-eye connection) that control eye movements and information processing. This is the primary domain of medically supervised Vision Therapy, and its effectiveness has been proven under specific conditions.2
3. Progression Control: This acknowledges an existing refractive error (mainly childhood myopia) and aims to manage its worsening over time. This is the domain of myopia control treatments, which are actively researched and applied in modern ophthalmology.5

Confusing these three concepts is the source of the greatest misunderstandings and misinformation in this field. For example, research showing that vision therapy improves convergence insufficiency is not evidence that eye exercises can 'reverse' myopia. Each approach has distinct goals and mechanisms, and the level of evidence for each must be evaluated separately.

Part 2: Evaluating Alternative Therapies and Self-Administered Eye Exercises

2.1 The Bates Method: A Case Study in Pseudoscience

Created in the early 20th century by ophthalmologist William H. Bates, the Bates Method claims to restore vision without glasses and still has some supporters today. However, the mainstream medical community considers its theoretical basis to be scientifically disproven and regards it as an ineffective and potentially dangerous alternative therapy.

Core Principles: The Bates Method posits that most vision problems like myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are caused by "mental strain," and can therefore be cured through relaxation.⁷ It prescribes specific techniques such as palming (covering eyes with palms), sunning (exposing eyes to sunlight), shifting (moving the eyes), and visualization.⁷

Scientific Refutation: Bates's core physiological claims have been clearly proven false by modern science.

• The claim that extraocular muscles control focus is incorrect; in reality, the intraocular ciliary muscle and lens are responsible.8
• The assertion that the eyeball changes shape to focus contradicts laboratory tests. The eyeball is too rigid a structure to undergo such changes.7

Review of Clinical Studies: Clinical studies attempting to verify the effectiveness of the Bates Method have consistently concluded that it is ineffective.

• A 1983 randomized controlled trial in India with myopic children over six months observed no significant improvement in visual acuity. However, some relief from eye strain was reported.7
• In 2004, the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) reviewed relevant studies and announced it could find no evidence that Bates Method techniques objectively benefit eyesight.7
• The conclusion reached in 1952 by optometry professor Elwin Marg that "most of his claims and theories have been considered false by practically all visual scientists" is still accepted as the academic consensus today.8

The Reality of Subjective Improvement: The 'moments of clarity' some users experience are likely not due to a real change in refractive error, but rather an improved ability of the brain to interpret a blurry image or a temporary contact lens effect from increased tear secretion.⁷

Confirmed Risks: The Bates Method is not just ineffective; it carries potential risks. The 'sunning' technique, which involves excessive sun exposure, can damage the eyes. Furthermore, advising people to remove their glasses in situations where corrective lenses are essential, such as driving, can lead to serious accidents.⁸ The greatest danger is that patients with conditions requiring timely medical treatment, like glaucoma or pediatric amblyopia, may delay proven medical care in favor of unverified methods, thereby missing the critical window for treatment.⁷

In conclusion, the enduring popularity of the Bates Method should be understood as a sociological phenomenon based on an emotional narrative of 'natural healing' and anecdotal testimony, not on medical efficacy.

2.2 General 'Eye Exercises' and Digital Apps: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Self-administered 'eye exercise' programs, easily accessible online or through smartphone apps, claim to improve refractive errors, including myopia. These claims must be distinguished from medically supervised vision therapy, and the scientific evidence for their effectiveness is very weak.

Highest Level of Evidence (Systematic Reviews): Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which synthesize multiple individual studies, provide the most reliable evidence for a treatment's effectiveness. The findings on the relationship between eye exercises and myopia are as follows:

• One systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up to 2022 concluded that eye exercises have "little or no effect in preventing or controlling the progression of myopia" when measured by changes in visual acuity and refractive error.13
• Another earlier review pointed out that "no clear scientific evidence has been published in the mainstream literature" to support the effectiveness of eye exercises for myopia, eye strain, or learning disabilities, and rated their use as "controversial."15
• The Cochrane review of interventions for myopia control, a global authority on evidence-based medicine, mentions the partial effectiveness of treatments like atropine or multifocal lenses but does not include general eye exercises as a method to slow myopia progression.16

Chinese Eye Exercises: The acupressure-based eye exercises implemented in Chinese schools for decades are a special case. While some studies have suggested a "modest protective effect," the limitations of the study designs (cross-sectional) prevent the establishment of a causal relationship. The overall conclusion is that their effect is likely insufficient to prevent myopia progression.¹⁸

Official Stance of Medical Bodies: Major medical organizations like the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) explicitly deny the effectiveness of eye exercises (vision training) for refractive errors. The AAO states there is no scientific evidence that eye exercises can make vision sharper or eliminate the need for glasses.¹⁹ Ophthalmologists in Korea also maintain that there is no evidence that eye exercises improve vision in adults, and that they should not be considered more than a form of stretching to relieve eye fatigue.²⁰

In conclusion, the scientific community has consistently tested the claim that eye exercises can correct refractive errors, and the results have uniformly been 'no effect.' This is not an 'unresearched' area, but rather an area that has been 'researched and found to be ineffective.'

Part 3: Vision Therapy: A Medically Supervised Neuro-Rehabilitative Approach

The term 'eye exercises' is often used interchangeably with Vision Therapy (VT), but the two are fundamentally different. Vision therapy is not a simple set of exercises performed on one's own, but a professional neuro-rehabilitative treatment program prescribed and supervised by a doctor for patients diagnosed with specific visual function problems.

3.1 The Principle of Neuroplasticity: Retraining the Brain-Eye Connection

The core principle of vision therapy is not to strengthen the eye muscles themselves. The muscles that control eye movement are already among the strongest in the human body.² Instead, vision therapy utilizes

neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to reorganize its own structure and function in response to new experiences.³

The therapy aims to retrain how the brain processes visual information and controls eye movements using a variety of tools, including specially designed lenses, prisms, filters, and computer programs.² This is analogous to physical therapy for bodily rehabilitation and can be thought of as 'physical therapy' for the visual system.²⁴

3.2 Clinically Proven Applications

Vision therapy is not a panacea for all vision problems; its effectiveness is supported by strong scientific evidence for specific visual function disorders.

• Convergence Insufficiency (CI): This is the area where the effectiveness of vision therapy is most clearly established. CI is a condition where the eyes fail to turn inward properly during close-up tasks like reading, causing eye strain, headaches, and double vision. Multiple large-scale clinical studies have proven that office-based vision therapy under a doctor's supervision is the most effective primary treatment.19
• Accommodative Dysfunction: Problems with focusing are recognized as being effectively treated with vision therapy.23
• Amblyopia and Strabismus: In the treatment of amblyopia ('lazy eye') and strabismus ('crossed eyes'), vision therapy (often called 'orthoptics' in this context) plays an important supportive role. It is typically used in conjunction with glasses and patching to help develop vision in the suppressed eye and encourage both eyes to function together.23 Recently, clinical trials for new binocular treatments, such as video games, are also being actively conducted.30

3.3 Debate Among Professional Groups and Scope of Application

There is a significant difference of opinion between the fields of ophthalmology and optometry regarding the scope of vision therapy's application. Understanding the core of this debate is essential for objectively evaluating information about vision therapy.

Ophthalmologists generally acknowledge the effectiveness of 'orthoptics' for convergence insufficiency and some cases of strabismus and amblyopia.¹⁹ However, they are highly skeptical of 'behavioral vision therapy' being applied more broadly to issues like learning disabilities or dyslexia, citing a lack of scientific evidence.²⁴ In contrast, optometrists, led by the American Optometric Association (AOA), consider vision therapy an essential treatment for a wide range of visual function problems and view its scope more broadly.²⁶

This difference in professional perspective is a primary reason for encountering conflicting information online. The table below compares the official positions of the two major eye care professional organizations in the U.S., the American Optometric Association (AOA) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), to clarify the structure of this debate.

Table 1: Comparison of AOA and AAO Positions on Vision Therapy

Application/Condition	American Optometric Association (AOA) Position 26	American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Position 19
Convergence Insufficiency (CI)	Strongly supported as an effective treatment.	Efficacy acknowledged; orthoptics are prescribed.
Amblyopia & Strabismus	Considered an essential part of visual rehabilitation.	Acknowledged that orthoptics are useful in specific cases.
Learning Disabilities/Dyslexia	Claimed to be effective in treating visual function problems that are 'contributing factors' hindering learning.	Emphasizes no scientific evidence of effectiveness for treating learning disabilities and that vision problems do not cause learning disabilities.
Refractive Errors (e.g., Myopia)	Does not claim to treat refractive errors themselves.	Clearly states that vision training cannot correct refractive errors.

3.4 Dissecting Claims About Vision Therapy and Learning Disabilities

The most contentious point in the vision therapy debate is its connection to learning disabilities, particularly dyslexia. Major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS), and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), have reached a firm scientific consensus that vision problems do not 'cause' learning disabilities like dyslexia.¹⁹ Dyslexia is a neurodevelopmental disorder related to the brain's processing of language information, not a visual problem.

The phenomenon of reading or writing letters backward is not a sign of a vision problem but a normal part of early developmental stages of learning to read and is related to language processing.²⁸

Here, the optometric community's argument is more nuanced. They do not claim that vision therapy treats dyslexia itself, but that undiagnosed visual function problems (e.g., convergence insufficiency) can be a 'contributing factor' that makes reading more difficult for a child with dyslexia.³⁴ The logic is that by treating the visual function problem, the child is better able to cope with their primary learning disability.

In conclusion, the debate over vision therapy is not a simple dichotomy of 'effective vs. ineffective.' It is a nuanced debate about 'what it is effective for.' Vision therapy has proven value in specific neurological areas (binocular vision), but its evidence is lacking when applied to fundamentally different domains (primary learning disabilities, refractive errors).

Part 4: Natural Improvement Phenomena and Myopia Management

The user's query focuses on research findings regarding 'cases of natural vision improvement.' While cases of 'spontaneous regression' are reported in medical literature, extreme caution is needed when interpreting these as evidence for general vision improvement methods.

4.1 Spontaneous Regression in a Clinical Context: Rare and Specific Cases

Medical literature has reported cases where 'myopic retinoschisis,' a condition where layers of the retina separate in patients with high myopia, has resolved naturally without surgery.³⁵ These reports hold significant academic interest.

However, the key here is 'context.' These are extremely rare phenomena occurring in eyes with severe pathological conditions, and are entirely different from simple myopia getting better on its own. Scientists report and study these cases precisely because they are not common but 'exceptional.'35 Therefore, using these few case reports on specific diseases as 'evidence' for the broad claim that the general public can naturally reverse myopia through eye exercises or other methods is a misuse of data.

4.2 The Reality of Myopia Management: Progression Control, Not Reversal

The concept of 'natural vision improvement' is most strongly contradicted by the very existence of 'myopia control,' a major research and clinical field in modern ophthalmology. If simple exercises could reverse myopia, this field, which receives massive global investment, would not need to exist.

The goal of modern myopia management is not to 'reverse' or 'cure' existing myopia, but primarily to 'slow down' its progression in growing children.⁵ This is to reduce the future risk of serious eye diseases associated with high myopia (e.g., retinal detachment, glaucoma). The main scientifically proven methods for myopia progression control are:

• Pharmacological Treatment: Low-dose atropine eye drops have been proven to be one of the most effective methods for inhibiting myopia progression and axial length growth. While the exact mechanism is not fully understood, its efficacy has been confirmed in multiple clinical trials.38
• Optical Treatment: Orthokeratology (Ortho-K) lenses or specially designed glasses and contact lenses use the principle of controlling the focus of light on the peripheral retina to send signals that inhibit the eyeball from elongating.5
• Environmental Factors: Spending 2-3 hours outdoors daily has been shown in multiple studies to be effective in inhibiting the onset and progression of myopia. It is believed that sun exposure stimulates dopamine release in the retina, which inhibits eye growth.42

The fact that complex and sophisticated methods like drugs, special lenses, and public health policies are employed to slow myopia progression by mere fractions of a diopter (0.1) per year is the strongest evidence that simple myopia is not a condition that can be easily reversed by exercise or willpower.

Part 5: The Role of Nutrition in Ocular Health

The impact of nutritional supplements on vision is also frequently mentioned in the context of 'natural vision improvement,' but their effects are limited to specific diseases and specific parts of the eye.

5.1 Macular Pigment and Retinal Protection: The AREDS/AREDS2 Studies

Nutrients like lutein and zeaxanthin are highly concentrated in the macula, the central part of the retina, where they filter harmful blue light and protect cells from oxidative stress.⁴⁵

The most important research validating the effects of these nutrients is the large-scale clinical trial led by the U.S. National Eye Institute (NEI), the 'Age-Related Eye Disease Studies (AREDS/AREDS2).'48 The key findings are:

• The specific combination of nutrients used in the study (including lutein/zeaxanthin, excluding beta-carotene) can reduce the risk of progression to more severe stages of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) by about 25% in patients with 'intermediate' or 'late' AMD.49
• However, the supplement did not show a 'preventive' effect in healthy individuals without AMD, nor was there a benefit for patients with 'early' AMD.50

Some other studies have shown that lutein/zeaxanthin supplementation can increase macular pigment optical density (MPOD), which may improve contrast sensitivity or glare, and even positively affect cognitive function in children.⁴⁵

5.2 Evaluating the Link Between Nutrition and Refractive Errors

The most critical point here is that major nutritional studies like AREDS/AREDS2 were not designed to evaluate the impact on refractive errors like myopia, and indeed, they found no such effect.⁴⁸ The focus of these studies was solely on 'retinal health,' specifically the disease of macular degeneration.

The relationship between nutrients and refractive errors must be clearly distinguished. Lutein and zeaxanthin act to protect the camera's 'film' (the retina) from light damage, but they do not change the physical shape of the camera 'body' (the eyeball) to solve focusing problems. The comprehensive term 'eye health' is often misused in marketing, but scientifically, it is essential to distinguish which part of the eye each nutrient and therapy acts upon and through what mechanism.

Part 6: Conclusion and Final Recommendations

6.1 Summary of Evidence: An Integrative Perspective

Synthesizing the analysis so far, claims of 'natural vision improvement' must be clearly distinguished based on their target and the level of scientific evidence. The table below summarizes the core claims and the level of scientific evidence for the main methods discussed in this report.

Table 2: Summary of Evidence for 'Natural' Vision Improvement Methods

Method	Claimed Outcome	Level of Scientific Evidence	Key Conclusion
Bates Method	Reversal of refractive error	Disproven: Rejected by clinical trials and scientific consensus.7	Ineffective and potentially harmful.
General Eye Exercises	Improvement of refractive error	Not Supported: Not proven effective in systematic reviews.13	No effect on improving refractive error. May be used as stretching to relieve eye fatigue.
Vision Therapy	Improvement of visual function (e.g., binocular vision)	Proven for specific conditions: Clinical trial evidence for conditions like convergence insufficiency.19	Standard treatment for convergence insufficiency. Not a universal solution for all vision problems.
Myopia Control Treatment	Slowing of pediatric myopia progression	Proven: Multiple clinical trials for atropine, special lenses, etc.5	An effective 'management' strategy for childhood myopia. Not a 'reversal' or 'cure.'
Nutritional Supplements	Reduced risk of AMD progression	Proven for specific disease: Efficacy confirmed in AREDS2 for patients with intermediate or later AMD.50	Unrelated to refractive errors. An intervention for specific risk groups to maintain retinal health.

6.2 Evidence-Based Practical Guidance for Individuals

For individuals seeking scientific research on vision improvement, the following practical guidance is recommended:

1. Focus on Proven Interventions: Clearly distinguish between treatments for specific, diagnosed conditions that are scientifically validated and general 'healing' claims that lack evidence.
2. Prioritize a Comprehensive Eye Exam: All vision problems should start with an accurate diagnosis from an ophthalmologist or optometrist before attempting self-diagnosis or alternative therapies. This will identify any underlying diseases and determine the most appropriate course of treatment.
3. Pay Attention to Pediatric Myopia Management: Parents of children with myopia should consult with a professional about proven methods for myopia progression control (low-dose atropine, special lenses, outdoor activities).
4. Consider Visual Function Problems: If you experience eye strain, double vision, or difficulty reading, it is advisable to be evaluated for visual function disorders like convergence insufficiency, for which vision therapy can be an effective treatment.
5. Do Not Confuse Healthy Habits with 'Cure': Taking regular breaks from screens, maintaining a balanced diet, and protecting your eyes from UV radiation are beneficial for eye comfort and long-term health. However, a clear line must be drawn between these healthy lifestyle habits and claims that they can 'cure' refractive errors. The former is wise self-care; the latter is pseudoscience lacking scientific evidence.

참고 자료

1. 비전테라피 (시각/시지각훈련) - 한국시지각센터, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, http://visiontherapy.co.kr/new/index.html?lf=left-cont2&sb=cont&page=7
2. What is Vision Therapy? - College of Optometrists in Vision Development (COVD), 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.covd.org/page/vision_therapy
3. What is Vision Therapy and Who Can It Benefit? - Grene Vision Group, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.grenevisiongroup.com/eye-care-resources/what-is-vision-therapy
4. What is Vision Therapy? | Clarkson Eyecare, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.clarksoneyecare.com/eye-care-resources/what-is-vision-therapy
5. Myopia Control in Children - American Academy of Ophthalmology, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.aao.org/eye-health/diseases/myopia-control-in-children
6. Why Progressive Myopia Is a Concern for Children and Adults - All About Vision, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/myopia/progression/
7. Bates method | Research Starters - EBSCO, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/health-and-medicine/bates-method
8. Bates method - Wikipedia, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bates_method
9. What is Vision Therapy and Who Does It Help? - eyecarecenter, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.eyecarecenter.com/eye-care-resources/what-is-vision-therapy
10. Bates Eye Method, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www2.internationalinsurance.org/GR-8-03/files?docid=RvO53-1489&title=bates-eye-method.pdf
11. Basic Principles of the Bates Method, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://seeing.org/techniques/basic-principles.html
12. What is the Bates Method? - Vivid Vision, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.seevividly.com/info/Physiology_of_Vision/The_Eyes/Bates_Method
13. Eye exercises for myopia prevention and control: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials - PubMed, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37740051/
14. Eye Exercises for Myopia Prevention and Control: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368198837_Eye_Exercises_for_Myopia_Prevention_and_Control_A_Systemic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis
15. A systematic review of the applicability and efficacy of eye exercises - PubMed, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15825744/
16. Cochrane Systematic Review of Myopia Interventions, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://reviewofmm.com/cochrane-systematic-review-of-myopia-interventions/
17. Interventions to slow the progression of short-sightedness in children | Cochrane, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.cochrane.org/evidence/CD014758_interventions-slow-progression-short-sightedness-children
18. The association between Chinese eye exercises and myopia in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Frontiers, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.950700/full
19. Vision Training Not Proven to Make Vision Sharper - American ..., 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/vision-training-not-proven-to-make-vision-sharper
20. [눈건강] 노안을 늦추는 시력회복운동법은?! | 눈건강운동 | 카이안과TV - YouTube, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b7ucjlfnaU
21. 눈운동하면 시력 좋아진다? 더 이상 속지 마세요.(김선영 안과 전문의) - YouTube, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG3vNuoIsTM
22. What is Vision Therapy and Who Can It Help? | Nationwide Vision, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nationwidevision.com/eye-care-resources/what-is-vision-therapy
23. Vision Therapy - SUNY College of Optometry - University Eye Center, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.universityeyecenter.org/vision-therapy/
24. Vision Therapy: What It Is & How It Works - Cleveland Clinic, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/vision-therapy
25. Vision Therapy - PressVision, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pressvision.com/vision-therapy/
26. Vision Therapy | AOA, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.aoa.org/practice/specialties/vision-therapy
27. Vision therapy - Wikipedia, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_therapy
28. Vision Therapy - American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology ..., 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://aapos.org/glossary/vision-therapy
29. 시각 기능 개선에 대한 비전 테라피의 효능 - ::: 한국시지각발달센터 :::, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, http://www.visiontherapy.co.kr/clinical/visual_lead.php?num=20
30. Strabismus Clinical Trials - Mayo Clinic Research, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials/diseases-conditions/strabismus-
31. Lazy Eye (Amblyopia) Clinical Trials - Mayo Clinic Research, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials/diseases-conditions/lazy-eye-(amblyopia)
32. UCSF Amblyopia Clinical Trials for 2025 — San Francisco Bay Area, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://clinicaltrials.ucsf.edu/amblyopia
33. Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS23): A Randomized Trial of Dichoptic Treatment for Amblyopia in Children 4 to 7 Years of Age - UMN - StudyFinder, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://studyfinder.umn.edu/studies/31671
34. Position Statement on Optometric Vision Therapy By the American Optometric Association (AOA), 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.birminghamvisiontherapy.com/position-statement-on-optometric-vision-therapy-by-the-american-optometric-association-aoa/
35. Spontaneous resolution of myopic retinoschisis - Chu - AME Case Reports, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://acr.amegroups.org/article/view/4827/html
36. Spontaneous improvement of myopic macular retinoschisis: case report and review of literature | Request PDF - ResearchGate, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308004129_Spontaneous_improvement_of_myopic_macular_retinoschisis_case_report_and_review_of_literature
37. Spontaneous Regression of Myopic Schisis - PubMed, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38647509/
38. Biological Mechanisms of Atropine Control of Myopia - PMC - PubMed Central, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7176345/
39. A Review of Myopia Control with Atropine - ResearchGate, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324884020_A_Review_of_Myopia_Control_with_Atropine
40. Five-Year Results of Atropine 0.01% Efficacy in Myopia Control in a European Population, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://reviewofmm.com/five-year-results-of-atropine-0-01-efficacy-in-myopia-control-in-a-european-population/
41. Safety and efficacy of atropine treatment for slowing myopia progression in children: a 5-year review - Hong Kong Journal of Ophthalmology, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://hkjo.hk/index.php/hkjo/article/download/255/226/715
42. 임시수 건강 가이드북 <110> 근시의 관리(하) - 서라벌신문, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, http://m.srbsm.co.kr/view.php?idx=52714&referer=
43. 근시 억제 치료 - 서울림안과 - 용산역 센트럴파크 타워, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.rimeye.co.kr/page/myopia.php
44. 근시 진행의 억제, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/35aa/6d7c3a46c4d1b9620f82c338e252fbbbc888.pdf
45. Clinical Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Lutein with High Bio-Accessibility on Macular Pigment Optical Density and Contrast Sensitivity: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Group Comparison Trial - PMC - PubMed Central, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7600844/
46. Effect of supplementation with lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3 fatty acids on macular pigment and visual function in young adults with long-term use of digital devices: study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study - PMC - PubMed Central, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528376/
47. Efficacy of lutein supplements on macular pigment optical density in highly myopic individuals: A randomized controlled trial - PMC - PubMed Central, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10036027/
48. National Eye Institute (NEI) Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) - dbGaP Study, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs002015.v2.p1
49. NCT00345176 | Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) - ClinicalTrials.gov, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00345176
50. AREDS/AREDS2 Frequently Asked Questions | National Eye Institute, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://www.nei.nih.gov/research/clinical-trials/age-related-eye-disease-studies-aredsareds2/aredsareds2-frequently-asked-questions
51. Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supplementation Improves Dynamic Visual and Cognitive Performance in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study - PubMed, 9월 13, 2025에 액세스, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38363462/