D

Deep Research Archives

  • new
  • |
  • threads
  • |
  • comments
  • |
  • show
  • |
  • ask
  • |
  • jobs
  • |
  • submit

Popular Stories

  • 공학적 반론: 현대 한국 운전자를 위한 15,000km 엔진오일 교환주기 해부2 points
  • Ray Kurzweil Influence, Predictive Accuracy, and Future Visions for Humanity2 points
  • 인지적 주권: 점술 심리 해체와 정신적 방어 체계 구축2 points
  • 성장기 시력 발달에 대한 종합 보고서: 근시의 원인과 빛 노출의 결정적 역할 분석2 points
  • The Scientific Basis of Diverse Sexual Orientations A Comprehensive Review2 points
  • New
  • |
  • Threads
  • |
  • Comments
  • |
  • Show
  • |
  • Ask
  • |
  • Jobs
  • |
  • Submit
  • |
  • Contact
Search…
threads
submit
login
  1. Home/
  2. Stories/
  3. Distinguishing Dark Matter from the Cosmos: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fermi-LAT Gamma-Ray Spectral Line Searches and Their Impact on WIMP Models
▲

Distinguishing Dark Matter from the Cosmos: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fermi-LAT Gamma-Ray Spectral Line Searches and Their Impact on WIMP Models

0 point by adroot1 3 days ago | flag | hide | 0 comments

Research Report: Distinguishing Dark Matter from the Cosmos: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fermi-LAT Gamma-Ray Spectral Line Searches and Their Impact on WIMP Models

Report Date: 2025-11-27

Executive Summary

This report synthesizes over a decade of gamma-ray observations by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) directed at the Galactic Center to address the challenge of distinguishing Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) dark matter annihilation signals from astrophysical backgrounds. The research reveals a profound dichotomy: while the search for a definitive, "smoking-gun" monochromatic gamma-ray spectral line has yielded consistently null results, analysis of the continuous gamma-ray spectrum reveals a persistent, ambiguous excess of emission.

The primary method for an unambiguous dark matter discovery, the detection of a sharp spectral line, remains unfulfilled. Extensive searches of up to 15 years of Fermi-LAT data have failed to identify any statistically significant line signal from 10 GeV to 2 TeV. A once-tantalizing anomaly around 130 GeV, reported in 2012, has since been refuted, failing to grow in significance with more data and ultimately being attributed to a likely statistical fluctuation or an instrumental artifact. This case study underscored the immense methodological rigor required for a credible claim, including proper accounting for the "look-elsewhere effect" and a deep understanding of instrument systematics.

In stark contrast, a broad, continuous excess of gamma-rays peaking at a few GeV, known as the Galactic Center Excess (GCE), remains a compelling but unresolved phenomenon. The GCE’s spatial distribution and energy spectrum are remarkably consistent with the annihilation of WIMPs in the tens to hundreds of GeV mass range. However, a viable and equally compelling astrophysical explanation—the collective emission from a large, unresolved population of millisecond pulsars—prevents any definitive conclusion. A newer, unverified report from November 2025 also points to a potential halo-like glow at 20 GeV, adding another layer of complexity to the Galactic Center's gamma-ray sky.

The most significant scientific outcome of the Fermi-LAT mission in this domain has been the power of its null results. The non-detection of spectral lines has enabled researchers to place the world's most stringent upper limits on the WIMP annihilation cross-section into photons. These constraints are so powerful that they fall below the canonical "thermal relic" cross-section for a wide range of WIMP masses below ~500 GeV. This directly challenges the foundational "WIMP miracle" paradigm, which elegantly connects the WIMP mass scale to the observed cosmic abundance of dark matter.

In conclusion, Fermi-LAT has not provided the definitive evidence for dark matter annihilation once hoped for. Instead, it has profoundly reshaped the landscape of WIMP research. It has demonstrated that distinguishing a diffuse dark matter signal from novel astrophysical source populations in a complex environment is exceptionally challenging with current instruments. More importantly, its stringent constraints have effectively closed vast regions of the WIMP parameter space, pushing the model into more complex and less conventional territory and motivating the global scientific community to broaden its search for the fundamental nature of dark matter.

1. Introduction

The cosmological standard model posits that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is a non-baryonic, non-luminous substance known as dark matter. While its gravitational effects are well-documented on galactic and cosmological scales, its fundamental particle nature remains one of the most significant unsolved mysteries in modern physics. Among the leading theoretical candidates are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), a class of particles emerging from theories beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. The "WIMP miracle" hypothesis suggests that a particle with a mass and interaction strength typical of the weak nuclear force would have been produced in the early universe in quantities that naturally match the observed dark matter abundance today.

One of the primary strategies for detecting WIMPs is indirect detection, which searches for the Standard Model particles (photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays) produced when dark matter particles annihilate or decay. The densest concentration of dark matter in our vicinity is predicted to be at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, making it the most promising target for such searches. The Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), a space-based gamma-ray observatory launched in 2008, has been monitoring the sky in the energy range from tens of MeV to over 1 TeV, providing an unprecedentedly deep view of the high-energy universe and, consequently, the Galactic Center.

This report addresses the central research query: To what extent do the specific gamma-ray spectral lines detected by the Fermi Telescope toward the Galactic Center distinguish dark matter annihilation from astrophysical background noise, and how do these findings challenge current constraints on WIMP models? The most sought-after signature of WIMP annihilation is a monochromatic gamma-ray spectral line, produced when two WIMPs annihilate directly into a pair of photons (γγ) or a photon and a Z boson (γZ). Such a line, with an energy directly related to the WIMP mass, would be a "smoking-gun" signature, as conventional astrophysical processes overwhelmingly produce broad, continuous gamma-ray spectra.

This comprehensive research report synthesizes the findings from an expansive survey of over a decade of Fermi-LAT observations and the associated theoretical and phenomenological analyses. It explores the persistent ambiguity of observed gamma-ray excesses, the rigorous methodologies developed to hunt for faint signals within immense backgrounds, the definitive null results of spectral line searches, and the profound impact these findings have had on the viability of the WIMP dark matter paradigm.

2. Key Findings

The research consolidates into five principal findings that collectively define the current state of the search for dark matter spectral lines with the Fermi Telescope.

2.1. The Enduring Ambiguity of the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Sky

Despite unprecedented observational depth, the gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center remains a source of profound ambiguity. No definitive dark matter signal has been identified; instead, observations have revealed complex excesses that defy simple explanation.

  • The Galactic Center Excess (GCE): The most significant and well-studied anomaly is a persistent, spatially extended excess of continuum gamma-rays. This is not a spectral line. The GCE is characterized by a roughly spherically symmetric morphology centered on the galaxy's core and an energy spectrum that peaks at a few GeV. These properties are highly consistent with the expected signal from annihilating WIMPs with masses ranging from tens of GeV to as high as 800 GeV, depending on the assumed annihilation channel. However, a powerful astrophysical alternative exists: the cumulative emission from thousands of unresolved millisecond pulsars (MSPs) concentrated in the galactic bulge. As of late 2025, extensive analyses have failed to definitively distinguish between these two leading hypotheses.

  • The New 20 GeV Halo-like Glow: A recent study published in November 2025 reported a new potential signal—a halo-like glow of gamma rays with a photon energy peaking at 20 GeV. The signal's spatial distribution and energy spectrum are reported to align well with predictions for WIMP annihilation, potentially corresponding to a WIMP with a mass between 500 and 800 GeV. This finding is preliminary and requires rigorous independent verification by the scientific community, but it highlights that the Galactic Center continues to harbor potential signals of interest.

2.2. The Unfulfilled Promise of a "Smoking Gun": The Null Result of Spectral Line Searches

The most direct and unambiguous signature of WIMP annihilation—a monochromatic gamma-ray line—remains undetected. This null result is one of the most powerful scientific conclusions drawn from the Fermi-LAT mission.

  • No Statistically Significant Detection: After leveraging up to 15 years of observational data and employing advanced event reconstruction algorithms (e.g., Pass 8), comprehensive searches for spectral lines have yielded no globally significant detections. These searches have scanned for signals across a vast energy range, from 10 GeV to 2 TeV, in the Galactic Center, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, and other dark matter targets, with consistently null results.

2.3. A Case Study in Scientific Rigor: The Rise and Fall of the 130 GeV Line Anomaly

The history of a tentative gamma-ray line at ~130 GeV serves as a critical case study in the challenges of discovery and the necessity of scientific skepticism and methodological rigor.

  • Initial Excitement and Downgrade: In 2012, independent analyses reported a tantalizing line-like feature at ~130 GeV from the Galactic Center with a local statistical significance of up to 4.6σ. However, a subsequent official analysis by the Fermi-LAT collaboration in 2013, using a larger and better-calibrated dataset, downgraded the feature's local significance to 3.3σ. Crucially, when the "look-elsewhere effect" was properly accounted for, the global significance fell to a statistically unconvincing 1.5σ.

  • Final Refutation: The feature's credibility was further undermined by physical and astrophysical inconsistencies. Analyses revealed the line was narrower than the LAT's own instrumental energy resolution, a strong indicator of a systematic artifact. Furthermore, its spatial location was correlated with the Fermi Bubbles, colossal structures of gamma-ray emission where complex particle physics could mimic a line-like spectral break. With the accumulation of 14-15 years of data, this marginal excess has been entirely subsumed by statistics and is no longer considered a viable signal.

2.4. Powerful Constraints on WIMP Models from Non-Detection

The absence of a confirmed spectral line is not a failure but a profound scientific result that has placed some of the most stringent constraints on the WIMP dark matter hypothesis.

  • Stringent Upper Limits: The null results have been translated into powerful upper limits on the velocity-averaged annihilation cross-section (⟨σv⟩) for channels producing monochromatic photons. These limits, reaching as low as ⟨σv⟩ ≲ 6×10⁻³⁰ cm³/s for WIMP masses between 10 GeV and 500 GeV, are the most sensitive in the world for these channels.

  • The "WIMP Miracle" Under Pressure: A key motivation for the WIMP paradigm is that its predicted annihilation cross-section in the early universe, the "thermal relic" cross-section (~3×10⁻²⁶ cm³/s), naturally yields the correct dark matter abundance. The Fermi-LAT limits now probe below this canonical value for a significant portion of the sub-TeV WIMP mass range. This creates a deep tension, suggesting that if WIMPs exist in this mass range, they must have properties that are more complex than those predicted by the simplest models. Large portions of the previously allowed WIMP parameter space have been definitively ruled out.

2.5. Methodological Sophistication in Signal-Background Separation

The search for dark matter signals in the Galactic Center has driven the development of highly sophisticated techniques for data analysis and background modeling, setting a new standard for astrophysical searches.

  • Complex Background Modeling: A credible search requires a multi-component model that accounts for all known sources of gamma-rays. This includes: (1) Galactic diffuse emission from cosmic-ray interactions, modeled with tools like GALPROP; (2) resolved astrophysical point sources from catalogues; (3) a collective contribution from unresolved point sources, modeled with statistical techniques like 1pPDF; and (4) an isotropic background from extragalactic sources and residual instrument effects.

  • High Threshold for Discovery: The particle physics community demands a high standard of proof for a discovery claim: a global statistical significance of 5 standard deviations (5σ). This threshold rigorously accounts for the look-elsewhere effect, which acknowledges the increased probability of finding a random fluctuation when searching across a large parameter space of energies and locations. The cautionary tale of the 130 GeV line, whose local significance of >3σ corresponded to a global significance of just 1.5σ, powerfully illustrates the importance of this standard.

3. Detailed Analysis

This section delves deeper into the key findings, exploring the technical details, the interplay between different observational results, and their collective impact on the field.

3.1. The Dichotomy of Galactic Center Signals: Continuum Excess vs. Spectral Lines

The central narrative emerging from Fermi-LAT's observations of the Galactic Center is a stark conflict between a persistent, ambiguous continuum signal (the GCE) and the definitive absence of an expected "smoking-gun" line signal. This dichotomy has become a powerful tool for constraining dark matter models.

The Enduring Puzzle of the Galactic Center Excess (GCE)

The GCE remains the most tantalizing hint of new physics in the gamma-ray sky. Its spatial morphology, roughly tracing a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) dark matter profile, and its spectral peak at a few GeV are precisely what one might expect from the annihilation of a ~50-200 GeV WIMP into quarks or tau leptons. However, the dark matter interpretation is plagued by challenges:

  1. The Astrophysical Mimic: The millisecond pulsar hypothesis is not merely speculative. MSPs are known gamma-ray emitters, and a large population is expected to reside in the dense stellar environment of the galactic bulge. Studies analyzing the GCE's morphology have yielded conflicting results: some find it is better described by a smooth, spherical dark matter halo, while others show its distribution correlates more strongly with the boxy/peanut-shaped stellar structures of the bulge, favoring the MSP hypothesis. The inability to resolve this morphological question with Fermi-LAT's angular resolution leaves the origin fundamentally uncertain.
  2. The Cross-Section Tension: If the GCE is attributed to WIMPs, its brightness implies an annihilation cross-section that is roughly an order of magnitude larger than the canonical thermal relic value. To reconcile this, theorists must invoke non-standard mechanisms that enhance the annihilation rate in the low-velocity environment of the present-day galaxy, such as the Sommerfeld effect or resonant annihilation. While possible, these additions increase the model's complexity.

The Power of Null Results from Spectral Line Searches

While the GCE provides an ambiguous hint, the search for sharp spectral lines provides a definitive constraint. Any WIMP model capable of producing a continuum signal via annihilation into Standard Model particles (like quarks, which would explain the GCE) will also inevitably produce a monochromatic line signal through higher-order quantum loop processes. The rate of this line production is directly tied to the primary annihilation channel.

This creates a powerful consistency check: a WIMP model proposed to explain the GCE must not only fit its continuum spectrum but must also predict a line signal that is fainter than the upper limits set by Fermi-LAT's dedicated line searches. In many cases, this check fails. Well-motivated WIMP models that provide a good fit to the GCE predict a line signal that should have already been detected. The fact that it has not been seen effectively rules out these specific models. This conflict forces model-builders to consider scenarios where the branching ratio to monochromatic photons is naturally suppressed, such as models where WIMPs annihilate predominantly into leptons (electrons, muons) or neutrinos.

3.2. Methodological Foundations and Statistical Challenges

The scientific value of the Fermi-LAT results, particularly the null results, is built upon a foundation of extreme methodological rigor. Disentangling a potential faint signal from the overwhelming and complex astrophysical foreground of the Galactic Center is a monumental task.

The Likelihood Framework

The standard tool is the unbinned likelihood analysis. This statistical method compares the observed photon data (their energies and arrival directions) against a composite model of the sky. The model includes spatial and spectral templates for all known background components and a hypothetical dark matter signal. By calculating the likelihood of the data given a background-only model versus the likelihood of the data given a background-plus-signal model, analysts can quantify the statistical preference for a dark matter signal via a Test Statistic (TS).

The fidelity of this analysis is entirely dependent on the accuracy of the background model. Any mismodeling—for instance, an incorrect assumption about the distribution of interstellar gas or an unaccounted-for population of faint sources—could create an artificial excess or mask a real signal. This is why extensive effort is invested in developing data-driven background templates using sophisticated codes like GALPROP and in modeling unresolved sources with statistical techniques like 1pPDF pixel-count statistics.

The High Bar for Discovery: The "Look-Elsewhere Effect"

The cautionary tale of the 130 GeV line provides the quintessential example of the "look-elsewhere effect" and the necessity of distinguishing between local and global significance.

  • Local Significance: This measures the probability of a random fluctuation producing an excess of the observed size in a single, pre-specified energy bin and location. A 3.3σ local significance corresponds to a probability of about 1 in 1000.
  • Global Significance: This measures the probability of a random fluctuation of that size appearing anywhere in the entire search space (i.e., across all scanned energies and sky locations). Because the search space is vast, the probability of a chance fluctuation appearing somewhere is much higher.

Properly accounting for this effect, through statistical trials or analytical formulae, applies a "trials factor" penalty that reduces the final significance. The downgrade of the 130 GeV feature's significance from a tantalizing 3.3σ (local) to a negligible 1.5σ (global) demonstrates that without this correction, researchers risk claiming discoveries based on statistical noise. The 5σ global threshold (a false-positive probability of less than one in 3.5 million) is the community-accepted standard to prevent such errors.

The Imperative of Instrument Characterization

A final, critical lesson from the 130 GeV anomaly was the importance of understanding the detector itself. The finding that the feature was significantly narrower than the Fermi-LAT's energy dispersion function was a physical red flag. A true flux of monoenergetic gamma rays from space would be "smeared out" by the instrument's imperfect energy measurement, producing a spectral feature with a predictable width. A feature that is too sharp points towards an instrumental artifact or a flaw in the analysis, not an astrophysical signal. This highlights that a credible detection requires not just statistical significance but also physical consistency with the known properties of the telescope.

3.3. Reshaping the WIMP Paradigm: The Impact of Fermi-LAT Constraints

The most enduring legacy of Fermi-LAT's dark matter program is the transformative impact its constraints have had on the WIMP paradigm. The robust non-detection of spectral lines has systematically closed off large portions of the model's most attractive parameter space.

Directly Challenging the "WIMP Miracle"

The thermal relic hypothesis, or "WIMP miracle," is compelling because it provides a deep connection between particle physics and cosmology without fine-tuning. It predicts a specific target for the present-day annihilation cross-section: ⟨σv⟩ ≈ 3×10⁻²⁶ cm³/s. The latest Fermi-LAT line searches have achieved sensitivities that probe below this canonical value for WIMP masses roughly between 30 and 500 GeV. This means that for a wide range of masses, the simplest WIMP models that would have naturally produced the right amount of dark matter in the early universe are now excluded. While this does not rule out WIMPs entirely, it forces the paradigm to evolve in several ways:

  • Higher Masses: The constraints are strongest in the sub-TeV range where Fermi-LAT is most sensitive. This pushes interest toward multi-TeV WIMPs, which will be the primary targets for the next generation of ground-based gamma-ray telescopes like the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA).
  • Different Annihilation Channels: Models where WIMPs annihilate primarily into channels with low gamma-ray yields (e.g., neutrinos or first-generation leptons) are less constrained by Fermi-LAT and remain viable.
  • Non-Standard Cosmologies: The connection between the early-universe and present-day annihilation rates can be broken in non-standard cosmological scenarios, allowing a WIMP to have a smaller cross-section today.

The Role of Astrophysical Uncertainties

It is crucial to note that the strength of these constraints is modulated by our incomplete understanding of the dark matter halo itself. The predicted gamma-ray flux is proportional to the square of the dark matter density integrated along the line of sight (the "J-factor"). The limits are typically quoted for a standard NFW profile. If the true profile is steeper, or "contracted," the limits become even stronger. Conversely, if the profile is shallower, or "cored," the limits are weakened. By presenting constraints for a range of plausible halo profiles, researchers provide a more robust picture of the excluded parameter space while transparently acknowledging these underlying systematic uncertainties.

Finally, the multi-messenger context is critical. The non-detection of a gamma-ray signal from dark matter-dominated dwarf spheroidal galaxies—"cleaner" but more distant targets than the Galactic Center—provides a powerful cross-check. The lack of a confirmed signal from dSphs places independent constraints on the WIMP cross-section, further strengthening the case against a dark matter origin for the GCE and adding pressure on the WIMP paradigm as a whole.

4. Discussion

The synthesis of over a decade of Fermi-LAT observations reveals a scientific narrative that has shifted from one of hopeful discovery to one of powerful, systematic exclusion. The search for a "smoking gun" spectral line, once seen as the most promising path to identifying the particle nature of dark matter, has instead become the most potent tool for constraining it.

The central tension in the data—the ambiguous GCE versus the null line search result—is not a contradiction but a powerful diagnostic. The existence of the GCE keeps the WIMP hypothesis compelling, providing a specific anomaly that fits a dark matter explanation remarkably well. Yet, the simultaneous absence of the expected line signal acts as a sharp razor, cutting away the simplest WIMP models that would explain the GCE. This forces the conversation into more nuanced territory: either the GCE is a red herring caused by a new population of astrophysical sources like millisecond pulsars, or dark matter has more complex properties than originally envisioned.

The rigorous methodological evolution driven by this search cannot be overstated. The vetting and ultimate dismissal of the 130 GeV line anomaly was a triumph of the scientific process. It validated the statistical tools, reinforced the high bar for discovery, and demonstrated the critical importance of a deep understanding of instrumental systematics. These lessons have profound implications for all future searches for faint signals in high-background environments, from gamma-ray astronomy to gravitational wave detection.

The cumulative impact of the Fermi-LAT constraints has been to fundamentally reshape the landscape of particle dark matter. The canonical WIMP, once the undisputed front-runner, now finds its most natural parameter space severely restricted. This has catalyzed a diversification in the field, increasing theoretical and experimental interest in alternative candidates like axions, sterile neutrinos, and primordial black holes. While the WIMP remains a viable candidate, particularly at higher masses beyond Fermi-LAT's reach, it no longer enjoys the same level of theoretical certainty it once did. The window of possibilities has shrunk, and the pressure on the model has grown immensely.

5. Conclusions

This comprehensive analysis of Fermi-LAT's search for gamma-ray spectral lines from the Galactic Center yields clear answers to the motivating research query.

Distinguishing Dark Matter from Astrophysical Backgrounds: In theory, the detection of a statistically significant, monochromatic gamma-ray spectral line would provide a definitive tool to distinguish dark matter annihilation from astrophysical noise, as no standard astrophysical processes are known to produce such a feature. In practice, however, the persistent non-detection of any such lines by the Fermi Telescope means this powerful tool has not been able to make this distinction. Instead, the focus has remained on continuum signals like the Galactic Center Excess, where the distinction is highly ambiguous due to compelling astrophysical mimics like millisecond pulsars. Therefore, the primary contribution of the spectral line search has not been to distinguish a signal but to constrain the possibility of one existing.

Challenging Constraints on WIMP Models: The findings from Fermi-LAT's spectral line searches present the most significant and direct challenge to the Weakly Interacting Massive Particle paradigm to date, particularly for WIMP masses below ~1 TeV. The powerful upper limits on the annihilation cross-section, derived from over a decade of null results, have systematically ruled out vast regions of the parameter space for many of the simplest and most well-motivated WIMP models. By probing below the canonical thermal relic cross-section, these results have severely strained the elegant "WIMP miracle" hypothesis, forcing the WIMP paradigm to evolve toward more complex models, higher mass ranges, or alternative annihilation channels.

In summary, the Fermi Large Area Telescope has not found the "smoking gun" of dark matter. Instead, its legacy is one of profound and meticulous constraint. Through its deep, long-term observations of the Galactic Center, it has demonstrated the immense difficulty of searching for new physics in complex astrophysical environments. By finding no definitive signal, it has provided a crucial negative result that has reshaped an entire field of research, sharpening the focus of future experiments and challenging theorists to look beyond the simplest paradigms in the ongoing quest to understand the nature of dark matter. The stage is now set for the next generation of instruments, such as the Cherenkov Telescope Array, to build upon the solid foundation of limits established by Fermi and continue the search at higher energies.

References

Total unique sources: 139

IDSourceIDSourceIDSource
[1]azoquantum.com[2]sciencemediacentre.es[3]innovationnewsnetwork.com
[4]theguardian.com[5]escholarship.org[6]youtube.com
[7]stanford.edu[8]sissa.it[9]physicsworld.com
[10]arxiv.org[11]nasa.gov[12]arxiv.org
[13]core.ac.uk[14]sciencefocus.com[15]aanda.org
[16]arxiv.org[17]arxiv.org[18]indiatimes.com
[19]sci.news[20]wikipedia.org[21]physicsforums.com
[22]arxiv.org[23]arxiv.org[24]arxiv.org
[25]nih.gov[26]researchgate.net[27]annualreviews.org
[28]wikipedia.org[29]wikipedia.org[30]arxiv.org
[31]arxiv.org[32]azoquantum.com[33]discovermagazine.com
[34]arxiv.org[35]arxiv.org[36]reddit.com
[37]theguardian.com[38]popularmechanics.com[39]arxiv.org
[40]trlinden.com[41]nasa.gov[42]in2p3.fr
[43]researchgate.net[44]nih.gov[45]innovationnewsnetwork.com
[46]semanticscholar.org[47]arxiv.org[48]arxiv.org
[49]researchgate.net[50]arxiv.org[51]arxiv.org
[52]annualreviews.org[53]nasa.gov[54]scipost.org
[55]arxiv.org[56]arxiv.org[57]escholarship.org
[58]arxiv.org[59]semanticscholar.org[60]researchgate.net
[61]researchgate.net[62]policycommons.net[63]escholarship.org
[64]arxiv.org[65]arxiv.org[66]arxiv.org
[67]physicsforums.com[68]arxiv.org[69]osti.gov
[70]arxiv.org[71]reddit.com[72]wikipedia.org
[73]stanford.edu[74]arxiv.org[75]scitechdaily.com
[76]reddit.com[77]azoquantum.com[78]popularmechanics.com
[79]indiatimes.com[80]researchgate.net[81]researchgate.net
[82]sciencemediacentre.es[83]arxiv.org[84]semanticscholar.org
[85]forbes.com[86]wikipedia.org[87]nasa.gov
[88]sciencealert.com[89]nasa.gov[90]aip.org
[91]aip.org[92]sissa.it[93]researchgate.net
[94]nasa.gov[95]ycombinator.com[96]nasa.gov
[97]scienceblog.com[98]arxiv.org[99]arxiv.org
[100]arxiv.org[101]cern.ch[102]arxiv.org
[103]researchgate.net[104]arxiv.org[105]arxiv.org
[106]desy.de[107]arxiv.org[108]researchgate.net
[109]desy.de[110]arxiv.org[111]arxiv.org
[112]researchgate.net[113]aip.org[114]arxiv.org
[115]arxiv.org[116]oup.com[117]researchgate.net
[118]darkmatterdarkenergy.com[119]arxiv.org[120]arxiv.org
[121]physicsforums.com[122]semanticscholar.org[123]arxiv.org
[124]arxiv.org[125]arxiv.org[126]nasa.gov
[127]arxiv.org[128]arxiv.org[129]arxiv.org
[130]semanticscholar.org[131]scipost.org[132]arxiv.org
[133]arxiv.org[134]semanticscholar.org[135]arxiv.org
[136]semanticscholar.org[137]arxiv.org[138]arxiv.org
[139]arxiv.org

Related Topics

Latest StoriesMore story
No comments to show